Sept 21 ,1997                               
IF YOU'RE SURLY AND YOU KNOW IT
  Clap clap!
5:01 am
    --- I've been thinking about my lonely self, wondering how it is one socializes. I watch other people do it a great deal. It LOOKS easy. You just wander up to the nearest available stranger and let the dialogue commence. If it turns out to be a monologue, or uninteresting, you excuse yourself and select the next nearest person to try it on.

    Then I realized that looking surly all the time probably isn't real conducive to encouraging strangers to talk (back) to you. When I'm walking around, I'm pretty sure I look none too happy. It isn't something I have to think about to maintain. Possibly because a few ingredients of mine are Chinese genes and upbringing, I tend to not wander around smiling and gabbing like Mr. Rogers in the land of make believe. That's really what a lot of people seem like to me: artificial expressions of delight over a endless litany of pointless babble. People are a lot like daytime television in that respect. Those people have rich, varied social lives and many good friends.

    When I was living in my mother's house, where my little brother and older sister #2 kept the television on through most of the day, I was periodically struck by how much having the TV on is like having someone in your house just BLABBERING non-stop. "..bleh blah boo bah beh beh bleah mooma bih foo nah eehh.." The TV is like your friend that talks on and on without worrying about whether you're responding or not. People like TV. People like people that blabber on and on non-stop. Perhaps they are reminded of TV.

    Today as band practice was cleaning up, I was listening to the people in the vicinity talking to each other. They remind me of TV. People say such stupid stuff just to say something. And it works! Generating non-stop bibble-babble is rewarded with attention and empathy. Is there a purpose for talking other than communicating what you are saying? No one told me! I thought the only reason I would want to say anything is because I had something to say. I wasn't taught about the secret of blabbering inanity to make friends and influence people. Is it at least humorous inanity? Yes, but no, not on purpose. Much of it is pointing out obvious features of the immediate surroundings. Oh yeah! That's what all that noise is called! Small talk!

    I think the purpose of small talk is to make it unecessary for people to chant things like "hap-py-hap-py-hap-py-hap-py" to signal that they are in an amiable mood and a good candidate for socialization. Verbal reassurance that everything is hunky-dory between you, me, this rock, that tree, and the shore and the X-wing. I sound pretty disdainful of this silly practice, but I'm going to be trying it out tomorrow.

  You're going to babble?
    --- I'm going to make small talk with anyone that gets anywhere near me. I think I sort of know how to do it. I've done it before, a little. Sometimes my small talk gets a little too much direction to it and starts proceeding up the scale from "unthreatening, barely coherent murmurings" to "accusatory didactic tirade". To avoid this unpleasant evolution, I do spend a lot of time saying words that aren't sentences or aren't relevant to anything within a twenty mile radius. I get sort of a childish kick out of emitting surrealist nonsense.

    I don't know what I'm going to do about my face, though. Maybe if I talk enough, people will assume that I have some sort of nerve disorder which prevents me from smiling. I'm not good enough at talking yet to achieve that level of clouding. I'll be practicing this week. Watch me talk! It's gonna be funny. The first one is going to be really hard, too. Once I have a local-area-reputation for being talky, though, it will actually be more difficult to NOT talk. Neat=o! Aright, I'm going to break the fucked up sleep cycles by trying to sleep NOW and wake up before noon instead of letting my bedtime get later and later until it wraps around.

    So, what does it mean?

    I can only answer that question with more questions. What if there were a thing which had the sole purpose of being ambiguous? It is intended to make every observer come up with their own interpretation, possibly causing disagreement among the different witnesses of the thing. To give a straight answer as to the meaning of the thing would immediately destroy it's only value, making it dead, common, and worthless.

    So it's supposed to be ambiguous?

    You've missed the point. No, you're making a point that doesn't exist.

    You can laugh at him, but he understands something about me that none of you do.

                              GOTO TOP

9-20-97 Sept 9-22-97

©copyright 1997 Andrew Denyes. Opinions expressed are mine. Everything else is true.